Tissue based cancer

Cancer diagnosis and treatment strategies are continuously evolving, and the identification of reliable biomarkers is a central element to improve patient outcomes. In recent years, a paradigm shift has emerged through a study that offers a fresh perspective on identifying protein biomarkers based on their subcellular distribution rather than merely their quantity. This innovative approach holds promise in enhancing our abilities to detect and treat liver cancers with unprecedented precision.

Published in “Scientific Reports” (Sci Rep) in May 2019, authors Sajic Tatjana et al. introduced a cutting-edge strategy that focuses on the subcellular distribution of proteins, particularly the mitochondrial fold enrichment (mtFE) score. This index factors in the protein abundance changes and the distribution between the cytosol and mitochondria, providing enhanced classification of cancer samples.

The study, titled “A new class of protein biomarkers based on subcellular distribution: application to a mouse liver cancer model,” delineated this novel strategy in a biological model comprising wild-type and mutant mice with a liver-specific gene deletion of Liver receptor homolog 1 (Lrh-1 hep-/-). The findings demonstrated a powerful application of the mtFE score in discerning mitochondrial changes linked to liver cancer’s progression and development (DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43091-z).

The Mitochondrial Connection in Cancer

It is well-established that cancer cells undergo metabolic reprogramming, often leading to altered mitochondrial function. Mitochondria, the cellular powerhouses, are not only implicated in energy production but also play a critical role in apoptosis and cellular signaling. Dysfunctions in these organelles are frequently observed in various cancer types, underscoring the potential of mtFE as a biomarker that can exploit this aspect of cancer cell biology.

mtFE Score: A New Frontier in Biomarker Discovery

By combining data from total cellular lysates with mitochondria-enriched fractions, the mtFE score homes in on shiftings in the proteome that might elude conventional investigations. It acts as a dual-purpose tool, highlighting quantitative changes in protein levels and their subcellular localization—each of which may yield valuable insights into the pathology of cancer.

In their methodology, Sajic Tatjana and colleagues used advanced mass spectrometry-based proteomics to measure and compare protein abundance in both the cytosol and mitochondria of liver tissues from both control and mutant mice. Such a technique is significant as it integrates robust quantitative proteomics with the spatial resolution of subcellular compartments, offering a comprehensive biological snapshot of cancer’s molecular underpinnings.

Key Findings and Implications

The study revealed a subset of proteins that exhibited notable shifts in their mtFE scores in the context of liver cancer. These proteins belonged to diverse pathways and processes, including metabolic functions, stress response, and cell structure maintenance, each potentially contributing to cancer’s pathogenic landscape.

The significant alteration in the mitochondrial proteome offers experimental validation of the mtFE score as a biomarker. This proof-of-concept paves the way for applying the mtFE scoring system to human tissue samples in future studies and potentially clinical settings.

Challenges and Future Perspectives

While promising, this new class of protein biomarkers is not without its challenges. The complexity of the proteome and the dynamic nature of protein interactions and localization demand sophisticated experimental designs and computational analyses. The study by Sajic Tatjana and colleagues also underscores the importance of a thorough understanding of the biological context to accurately interpret mtFE scores.

Future research should aim to refine and standardize the mtFE scoring methodology for wide-scale application. Moreover, there should be a concerted effort to develop companion computational tools to handle the large datasets inherent in proteomic studies.

Implications for Clinical Practice

The application of an mtFE score could enhance the precision of cancer staging, influence therapeutic decisions, and predict patient outcomes more accurately. As a non-invasive or minimally invasive approach, it also promises to improve patient compliance and enable more frequent monitoring of disease progression or response to treatment.

Conclusion

The study by Sajic Tatjana and colleagues marks a significant advance in our quest for better cancer biomarkers. By shifting the focus from protein quantity to subcellular distribution, they have opened up a new avenue for research that could lead to more precise and effective cancer diagnosis and treatment. As we move forward, the integration of the mtFE score and other similar strategies will undoubtedly transform the landscape of oncological biomarker research and, ultimately, patient care.

References

1. Sajic T., et al. “A new class of protein biomarkers based on subcellular distribution: application to a mouse liver cancer model” Sci Rep. 2019 May 06. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43091-z.
2. Borrebaeck CA. “Precision diagnostics: moving towards protein biomarker signatures of clinical utility in cancer.” Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:199–204. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.153.
3. Poste G. “Bring on the biomarkers.” Nature. 2011;469:156–157. doi: 10.1038/469156a.
4. Hung MC, Link W. “Protein localization in disease and therapy.” J Cell Sci. 2011;124:3381–3392. doi: 10.1242/jcs.089110.
5. Thul P.J., et al. “A subcellular map of the human proteome.” Science. 2017;356(6340):eaal3321. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3321.

Keywords

1. Protein biomarkers
2. Mitochondrial fold enrichment (mtFE)
3. Subcellular distribution cancer
4. Liver cancer proteomics
5. Tissue-based cancer diagnosis