Introduction
Eosinophilic granuloma (EG) represents a rare, bony pathology characterized by the abnormal proliferation of histiocytes. Classified as the most common manifestation of Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), EG primarily targets the axial skeleton. When occurring in the head and neck region, mandibular lesions are frequently observed, which can lead to various challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Here, we explore a unique case of an aggressive EG in the mandible of a young patient, analyzing the diagnostic journey, the complications encountered with intralesional corticosteroid administration, and the subsequent resolution following a more invasive surgical intervention. This article also reflects on the invaluable insights provided by Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and underscores the importance of an accurate diagnostic approach for these rare entities.
Case Presentation and Diagnosis
The patient, a young adolescent male, presented with mandibular discomfort, which was initially addressed through local pharmacological treatment with intralesional corticosteroid therapy. Contrary to expected outcomes, not only did the patient’s symptoms exacerbate, but the lesion size increased, and the cortical bone integrity became compromised. Such unfavourable progressions prompted a more detailed diagnostic effort using CBCT, highlighting the need for a comprehensive examination through imaging modalities that can offer high-resolution insights.
Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as a Diagnostic Tool
Cone Beam Computed Tomography has served as a cornerstone in contemporary oral and maxillofacial imaging due to its capability to provide three-dimensional (3D) views, which are critical for planning the surgical management of various diseases, including EG. In the reported case, CBCT played a pivotal role in understanding the extent and behavior of the lesion, thus solidifying the diagnosis and shaping the treatment pathway. The high-detail visualization of bony structures obtained through CBCT allowed for an accurate assessment, distinguishing between benign and malignant conditions, and ruling out similar pathologies such as odontogenic tumors or cysts.
Management Dilemma and Treatment Outcomes
Mandibular EG can present a diagnostic conundrum often necessitating a biopsy for differential diagnosis. The mismanagement in the case report emphasizes the complexity surrounding correct therapeutic measures. After experiencing increased disease severity post-pharmacological treatment, radical surgery was elected. This change in treatment underscores the heterogeneity of EG presentations and their response to treatment, as conservative therapies might be insufficient for some aggressive cases. The successful disease resolution following the surgical intervention presents valuable insights for clinicians handling similar aggressive EG cases.
Discussion: Challenges and Considerations
EG, while rare, can manifest with aggressive behavior that necessitates a customized approach to management. The reported case underscores the importance of an early and accurate diagnosis, with CBCT being a critical tool in the investigative process. Moreover, the standard treatment approaches for EG, ranging from observation to systemic chemotherapy, with surgical resection being considered in resistant cases, are debated. Given the spontaneous resolution documented in some EG cases, the decision toward aggressive treatments must be approached cautiously. This balance between possible treatment options, aided by advancements in imaging and detailed histopathological analysis, ensures the choice of a treatment that aligns with the disease’s behavior.
Conclusion
The convergence of diagnostic imaging, pathological confirmation, and tailored surgical intervention delineates the nuanced approach required for the management of aggressive mandibular EG, as highlighted by this case study. The application of CBCT emerged as an invaluable investigative adjunct, while the case further contributes to the body of knowledge on the various presentations and treatment responses of EG. Recognizing its rarity, unpredictable behavior, and the potential for misdiagnosis and mistreatment, it is imperative that healthcare providers remain vigilant and resourceful to navigate such complex conditions effectively.
References
1. Izzetti, R., De Marco, E., Caramella, D., et al. (2019). Cone Beam CT study of a case of eosinophilic granuloma of the mandible in a young patient. BMJ Case Reports, 12(5), e228455. doi:10.1136/bcr-2018-228455
2. Favara, B. E., Feller, A. C., Pauli, M., et al. (1997). Contemporary classification of histiocytic disorders. The WHO Committee On Histiocytic/Reticulum Cell Proliferations. Reclassification Working Group of the Histiocyte Society. Med Pediatr Oncol, 29, 157-166.
3. Sherwani, R. K., Akhtar, K., Qadri, S., et al. (2014). Eosinophilic granuloma of the mandible: a diagnostic dilemma. BMJ Case Rep, 2014, bcr2013200274. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-200274
4. Bezdjian, A., Alarfaj, A. A., Varma, N., et al. (2015). Isolated Langerhans cell histiocytosis bone lesion in pediatric patients. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 153, 751–757. doi:10.1177/0194599815598969
5. Monsereenusorn, C., Rodriguez-Galindo, C. (2015). Clinical characteristics and treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 29, 853–873. doi:10.1016/j.hoc.2015.06.005
Keywords
1. Eosinophilic Granuloma Mandible
2. Cone Beam CT Imaging
3. Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis
4. Aggressive EG Treatment
5. CBCT Diagnostic Tool