Introduction
The delicate task of managing the oxygen requirements of infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) represents a constant challenge for medical professionals. Ensuring that preterm infants receive the right amount of oxygen is critical to avoid complications associated with both hypoxia and hyperoxia. The recent study “Evaluation of two SpO_2 alarm strategies in a single NICU” published in BMC Pediatrics has sparked significant interest in the medical community by suggesting a paradigm shift in the approach to manual titration of oxygen, particularly when using automated FiO2-SpO2 control systems (Auto-FiO2). This article examines the study’s implications and explores how a revised alarm strategy could help reduce alarm fatigue among NICU staff while enhancing patient care.
Background on Oxygen Management in NICUs
Maintaining optimal oxygen saturation (SpO_2) levels in preterm infants is crucial for their survival and long-term health, but finding the perfect balance can be elusive. Traditionally, clinical staff has relied on alarms set on pulse oximeters to indicate when a preterm infant’s oxygen levels fall outside of defined thresholds. These alarms trigger staff to manually adjust the oxygen provided, a method known as manual titration.
The Problem of Alarm Fatigue
Alarm fatigue has long been recognized as a significant issue in healthcare settings, particularly in NICUs, where critical monitors sound with high frequency, causing desensitization among staff. This can lead to slower responses to actual emergencies, potential overlook of critical alarms, and increased stress levels among medical providers. Johnson et al. (2017) and Cvach (2012) have highlighted the dangers of alarm fatigue and the necessity for effective strategies to combat it, emphasizing the critical need for optimizing alarm settings in NICUs.
The Randomized Crossover Study
Warakomska, Bachman, and Wilinska (2019) conducted a compelling study, registered under ISRCTN 49239883, that compared two oxygen saturation alarm strategies: ‘tight’ versus ‘loose.’ Over a period of 13 months, 26 neonates were involved in this crossover study, which took place in a single NICU. The research centered on determining the number of times oxygen saturation dropped below 80% or exceeded 97%, the frequency of critical alarms, and nurses’ response times.
Findings and Implications
The results were enlightening—the ‘loose’ alarm strategy, characterized by wider SpO_2 limits, culminated in a significant reduction in the median rate of critical alarms per day. This finding suggests that the looser strategy could decrease the burden of alarm fatigue while maintaining safe levels of oxygen saturation in infants. This could translate into a holistic improvement in both patient safety and the mental health of the medical staff attending to them.
Ethical Considerations and Study Transparency
The ethical considerations were thoroughly adhered to in this investigation, receiving approval from the Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education’s Ethics Committee, Warsaw, Poland, ensuring informed parental consent and maintaining neutrality concerning jurisdictional claims, as affirmed by Springer Nature.
Impact on Clinical Practice and Patient Care
The study has prompted NICU units to reevaluate their SpO_2 alarm parameters, which might result in broader adoption of automated oxygen control systems with integrated looser alarm strategies. Such systems have the potential to streamline the management of oxygen therapy, improving responses to actual hypoxemia and reducing unnecessary staff interventions.
Future Research Directions
Further longitudinal studies should investigate the long-term outcomes of infants managed under looser alarm parameters. Additionally, comparative research across multiple NICUs could yield more generalizable findings, thereby providing a stronger foundation for changing standard operating procedures.
Conclusion
The study by Warakomska et al., represented an essential step in questioning long-held conventions regarding SpO_2 alarm settings in NICUs. The findings have offered a new perspective, one that promises to alleviate alarm fatigue without compromising the care of the most vulnerable patients – preterm infants struggling for survival in NICUs. As this promising research continues to influence policy and practice, the potential for a global reassessment of alarm strategy paradigms looms on the horizon, carrying with it the prospect of safer, more effective NICU environments.
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1496-5
References
1. Cummings, J.J., & Polin, R.A. (2016). Committee on fetus and newborn. Oxygen targeting in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161576. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1576
2. Sweet, D.G., Carnielli, V., Greisen, G., et al. (2017). European consensus guidelines on the management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants – 2016 update. Neonatology, 111(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1159/000448985
3. Cummings, J.J., & Lakshminrusimha, S. (2017). Oxygen saturation targeting by pulse oximetry in the extremely low gestational age neonate: a quixotic quest. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 29(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000000458
4. Bitan, Y., Meyer, J., Shinar, D., & Zmora, E. (2004). Nurses’ reactions to alarms in a neonatal intensive care unit. Cognitive Technology and Work, 6, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-004-0162-2
5. Ketko, A.K., Martin, C.M., Nemshak, M.A., et al. (2015). Balancing the tension between hyperoxia prevention and alarm fatigue in the NICU. Pediatrics, 136(2), 496–504. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1550
Keywords
1. Neonatal Intensive Care Oxygen Management
2. NICU Alarm Fatigue Reduction
3. SpO2 Alarm Strategies
4. Preterm Infant Oxygen Saturation
5. Automated FiO2 Control Systems