Keywords
1. Palliative Care Tool
2. Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment
3. Palliative Education Intervention
4. Patient-Clinician Communication
5. Misconceptions in Palliative Care
In a groundbreaking development reported in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Laurie McLouth, Jerod L. Stapleton, and their team have created a pioneering patient tool aimed at facilitating timely palliative care referrals for advanced lung cancer patients. Their study, published with the DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.013, addresses a critical issue in oncology care: Overcoming patient misperceptions that often impede early discussions and referrals to palliative care.
The initiative overseen by McLouth and Stapleton reflects a combined effort from a distinguished team of researchers and medical experts at the University of Kentucky, including Vilma Bursac, Carina M. Zelaya, and others, who together represent a broad spectrum of expertise—from behavioral science and cancer biostatistics to neurology and gastroenterology.
Their recent paper, outlined in the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management’s January 2024 issue, presents the development and assessment of a web-based educational tool tailored for patients. This tool is part of a multilevel intervention strategy aimed at refining the referral process by addressing the roles of patients, clinicians, and the healthcare system as a whole.
Significance of Early Palliative Care Interventions in Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment
Palliative care is an invaluable component of advanced cancer care, focusing on improving the quality of life for patients and their families by addressing issues associated with life-threatening illnesses, including pain management and emotional support. However, misconceptions equating palliative care with hospice or end-of-life care alone have led many patients to decline or delay these services.
McLouth and her team recognized that improving education and communication about the nature and benefits of palliative care could enhance patient outcomes and lead to more timely and appropriate referrals. With this objective, their study engaged a small yet significant cohort of advanced lung cancer patients, asking them to test the acceptability and effectiveness of the new patient tool.
Testing and Feedback
The trial involved 20 patients with advanced-stage lung cancer, aged 60 ± 9.8 years, of whom 40% were male and 70% possessed a technical degree or less. The patients reviewed the web-based prototype and provided ratings on its acceptability (4.48 ± 0.55), appropriateness (4.37 ± 0.62), and feasibility (4.43 ± 0.59) on a five-point scale. The encouraging results showed that 75% of the participants expressed interest in utilizing palliative care services post-intervention, and 80% felt more motivated to discuss palliative care options with their oncologist.
Moreover, all patients who initially harbored misconceptions about palliative care, notably those conflating it with hospice care, reported a complete resolution of those misperceptions after engaging with the tool. These findings suggest that the educational component of the tool effectively dispels myths and clarifies the true intent and scope of palliative care.
Collaborative Input and Multi-Pronged Strategy
The research group sought feedback from a diverse collection of stakeholders, including six advanced lung cancer patients, four clinicians from oncology and palliative care sectors, and a clinic administrator. This collaborative approach ensured the patient education tool was crafted with direct inputs from all involved in the palliative care referral process.
A multilevel intervention design was conceptualized to encompass educational elements for both clinicians, through palliative care education, and for patients, by integrating the prototype into electronic health records, making it a seamless part of patient care workflows.
Looking Ahead
The promise of this patient-facing tool lies not only in the practical benefits of improved knowledge and motivation among patients but also in its potential to change the standard of care for advanced lung cancer treatment. The researchers hope that broader adoption of such educational interventions could lead to a more proactive approach to palliative care, where patients feel empowered to request this specialized support in the earlier phases of their illness.
Future studies are planned to further evaluate the tool’s impact on referral rates and patient outcomes over a longer duration and with larger patient populations, which could cement its role within the healthcare provision.
Closing Thoughts
McLouth and her team’s contribution represents a significant leap toward demystifying palliative care and placing an emphasis on patient-centered approaches in cancer treatment. With early palliative care discussions leading to better symptom management and potentially improved survival rates, tools like the one tested in this study could revolutionize the manner in which advanced lung cancer patients engage with their care options and make informed decisions in concert with their healthcare providers.
References
1. McLouth, L. E., Stapleton, J. L., Bursac, V., Zelaya, C. M., Shelton, B. J., Thakur, K., Hands, I., Blu, C., Chih, M.-Y., & McFarlin, J. M. (2024). Piloting a Patient Tool to Aid Palliative Care Referrals during Advanced Lung Cancer Treatment. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.013
2. Parikh, R. B., Kirch, R. A., Smith, T. J., & Temel, J. S. (2013). Early specialty palliative care–translating data in oncology into practice. The New England journal of medicine, 369(24), 2347–2351. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb1305469
3. Zimmermann, C., Swami, N., Krzyzanowska, M. et al. (2014). Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 383(9930), 1721–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62416-2
4. Ferrell, B. R., Temel, J. S., Temin, S., Alesi, E. R., Balboni, T. A., Basch, E. M., Firn, J. I., Paice, J. A., Peppercorn, J. M., Phillips, T., Stovall, E. L., Zimmermann, C., & Smith, T. J. (2017). Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(1), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.70.1474
5. Hui, D., & Bruera, E. (2016). Models of integration of oncology and palliative care. Annals of palliative medicine, 5(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2016.04.03